Israel stands
against negotiations with Palestinians after reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas. The statements
by two top political figures in the US policy have told such approach to conflict
the US policy in the Middle East. First President Obama declared that 1967 borders
are acceptable approach in the negotiations for the US interests in the region.
Then State Secretary H. Clinton said that he US government looks forward to a dialogue
with legitimate Islamic forces.
The Netanyahu
government has not been responsive to such new trend in global policy quite
reasonably echoing the rise of popular movement in Arab world and reshuffling the
relationship of countries of “Arab spring” with the Western governments. We have been referring to the increasing
pressure on Israel to halt settlement construction and start peace
negotiations. http://blog-abunajla.blogspot.com/2011_06_01_archive.html However the Israeli government resilience might have been rooted
in conceivable discrepancies in the US administration concerning priorities of
partnerships and relationship with Arab countries and Israel.
Today Defence
secretary of the US Lean Panetta warned Israel to avoid eventual isolation and
called to stay devoted to partnerships in Middle East, which certainly alluded
to the recent chill in relationship with Turkey. http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2011/12/20111231539907422.html. It is Saturday today, and a
response has not come from Netanyahu’s office. The statements, if any could be
harsh, but the point is what finally come up in the actual policy of Israeli
government. Has the time come to change a stand to negotiations, or is there a
rising trend to government changes in Israel, and the third, the less desirable option
could be continuing ignorance of the new trend in the Middle East, increasing
confrontation, and presumably further isolation of Israel?
No comments:
Post a Comment