Thursday 29 December 2011

“Arab Spring” and “Global Warming”: reflections on the eve of New Year

I was watching recently a TV program about Maya calendar that was told to be over in 2012. Some people interpreted it as a prediction of the end of the world. However Maya civilization experts argued that the actual meaning could be an indication of radical changes in the world, but not the end.

Changes have been around in the word when people in Middle East, in Tunisia, Egypt and other countries of the Arab world rose to change the boring practice of pressure, restrictions, total surveillance and suppression. They rose to struggle for their dignity and rights to have a say in decisions about their own and their country destiny. This movement was later named as “Arab spring”.

Not only Arabs were striving towards renovation and changes, American people were excited when black American was elected to govern the most powerful economy and nation, which symbolized the power of the West.  Two moves has met at the edge cutting line of Middle East policy and conflict: when Arabs have got coordinated to unite two contesting powers of Palestinian resistance.

We have indicated repeatedly to a global affect the Arab insurrection has made on Europe and other regions in the neighborhood. http://blog-abunajla.blogspot.com/2011/05/arab-revolution-may-overhaul-middle.html.  Protesters in the US and European capitals came to the streets to demand changes in bad practice of managing economy, banking, and social affairs. Italian prime-minister was first targeted by citizens and the first who has left the office already this year.

Unexpectedly Russia has raised citizens’ voices against the fraud in elections and corruption in governance.  The well expected scenario of Putin’s coming back to presidential office was challenged by thousands of protesters in the streets of Moscow in December.

Vaclav Havel and Kim Chen Il died almost simultaneously in December. Did their deaths signify a continuous contest between two conflicting governance systems – strictest authoritarianism and romantic democracy?  

This is a load we are going to take to the New Year, which seems promising considerable changes of the world policy architecture:
-          Democracy and authoritarianism: outcomes of elections in Egypt, resolution of Syria turmoil, responses from Arab monarchies  and after effects on Eurasia regimes are expected to cast more light on this global challenge
-          Dialogue with Islam:  whether Islamic groups and forces would get legitimized in international policy and relations, would there be a transformation of hatred and exclusiveness to tolerance and cooperation between Islam and the West?
-          Can we expect reshuffling of traditional alliances and political preferences in relationship between the US and Israel as well as within the Israeli society towards Arabs?
-          Do the changes in Middle East generate any response and could make affect on developments in Central Eurasia?
It is hard to predict developments along the lines enumerated above, however intersection and counter-effects seem driving the global policy and changes on every national level.

The renowned Russian historian Lev Gumilev developed a theory of passion as a driving force  of ethnic history. He saw an impetus for the passion in global environment conditions and cosmic cataclysms. Did Arab spring and global warming work as interrelated phenomena? Difficult question to answer. However the evident observation is that Arab spring might turn into a global worming to prove the truth of global policy and global human community based on values and concerns mutually shared.

Happy New Year!



Saturday 3 December 2011

Defence against offence: US Defence Secretary warned Israel about isolation in Middle East.


Israel stands against negotiations with Palestinians after  reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas. The statements by two top political figures in the US policy have told such approach to conflict the US policy in the Middle East. First President Obama declared that 1967 borders are acceptable approach in the negotiations for the US interests in the region. Then State Secretary H. Clinton said that he US government looks forward to a dialogue with legitimate Islamic forces.  

The Netanyahu government has not been responsive to such new trend in global policy quite reasonably echoing the rise of popular movement in Arab world and reshuffling the relationship of countries of “Arab spring” with the Western governments.  We have been referring to the increasing pressure on Israel to halt settlement construction and start peace negotiations. http://blog-abunajla.blogspot.com/2011_06_01_archive.html  However the Israeli government resilience might have been rooted in conceivable discrepancies in the US administration concerning priorities of partnerships and relationship with Arab countries and Israel.

Today Defence secretary of the US Lean Panetta warned Israel to avoid eventual isolation and called to stay devoted to partnerships in Middle East, which certainly alluded to the recent chill in relationship with Turkey. http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2011/12/20111231539907422.html. It is Saturday today, and a response has not come from Netanyahu’s office. The statements, if any could be harsh, but the point is what finally come up in the actual policy of Israeli government. Has the time come to change a stand to negotiations, or is there a rising trend to government changes in Israel, and the third, the less desirable option could be continuing ignorance of the new trend in the Middle East, increasing confrontation, and presumably further isolation of Israel?